John Sperle vs Svyatoslav Gulin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Gulin edges Sperle in second serve performance over the last six months, winning 42.81% of points compared to Sperle's 41.12%. Could this serve give Gulin an advantage?
• Regarding return statistics, Sperle leads both in second serve returns (50.2% to Gulin's 44.49%) and first serve returns (33.27% to Gulin's 29.81%). Does this suggest a stronger return game for Sperle?
• While under pressure, Gulin has a slightly superior breakpoint save percentage at 50.27% against Sperle's 45.15%. This might prove crucial during critical moments in a match.
• The performance overview shows Gulin with a higher match win percentage over the past year, posting 74.07% compared to Sperle's 54.55%.
• Both players excel on clay courts, but Gulin has a better win percentage at 72% versus Sperle's 61%, indicating a stronger affinity for clay surfaces.
• Considering tournament levels, Gulin boasts a higher win percentage at the $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF level, winning 75.71% of matches, while Sperle has won 56.6%.
• Opponents faced by Gulin average a higher ranking (394.8) than those faced by Sperle (445.04), suggesting Gulin has faced stiffer competition.
• In deciding sets, Sperle proves to be slightly more successful, winning 67% compared to Gulin's 63%, highlighting strength in crucial set situations.
• Break point conversion ratios are close, with Sperle converting 38.19% of chances versus Gulin's 36%, reflecting similar effectiveness under breakpoint opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match presents an intriguing clash between two players with notable strengths and areas of competitive potential. Gulin showcases consistent performance with superior second serve stats and a strong breakpoint save efficiency, which could provide an edge in pivotal game scenarios.

Sperle, however, demonstrates robust return game capabilities, possibly neutralizing Gulin's serve advantage. Additionally, Sperle's greater success in deciding sets suggests a resilience that could weigh heavily if the match goes the distance.

Factoring in current form and event stats, Gulin's higher win percentage against slightly stronger opponents provides a marginal advantage. However, Sperle's return stats and ability under pressure make a compelling case for competitiveness.

In conclusion, while both players possess qualities that could tilt the outcome, Gulin appears marginally better positioned to secure victory in this contest.